Sonic Weapons: A Growing Controversy

Sonic weapons have become a controversial tool in crowd control. The recent protests in Serbia have reignited discussions about their use, with President Aleksandar Vucic denying claims of deploying banned sonic devices against demonstrators. This situation raises pressing concerns about the legality and ethical implications of such technology.

What Are Sonic Weapons?

Also known as acoustic weapons, sonic weapons generate powerful sound waves over extended distances. These can be either audible or inaudible, serving various purposes such as transmitting voice messages or dispersing crowds. Originally developed in the early 1990s, their military applications have gained traction since the 2000s.

Types of Sonic Weapons

There are three main categories of sonic weapons, each with unique capabilities:

• Long-Range Acoustic Device (LRAD): Created by Genasys Inc., LRAD can project sound up to 8,900 meters. It reaches noise levels of 160 decibels, which can cause pain and permanent hearing damage.
• Mosquito Device: Designed to emit high-pitched sounds, this device specifically targets younger individuals (teenagers and young adults), as older individuals typically experience reduced sensitivity to high frequencies.
• Infrasonic Weapons: Utilizing low-frequency sound waves, these devices can cause physical discomfort, disorientation, and even pain. While still under research, their potential as non-lethal weapons remains a topic of debate.

Health Risks and Concerns

Exposure to sonic weapons can result in serious health effects, including:

• Hearing loss and eardrum damage
• Tinnitus (persistent ringing in the ears)
• Headaches and nausea
• Disorientation and dizziness

Human rights organizations have raised alarms about their unintended impact, as bystanders and even law enforcement officers can suffer unintended harm.

Ethical and Legal Challenges

The deployment of sonic weapons remains legally and ethically contentious. Many regions have restrictions or outright bans due to concerns about excessive harm. Critics argue that using such devices during protests may infringe on fundamental human rights, particularly the right to peaceful assembly.

Military Applications

Sonic weapons have been incorporated into military strategies, notably in conflict zones such as Iraq. Their appeal lies in their ability to control crowds without lethal force. However, the long-term effects of exposure remain poorly documented, raising further concerns about their use.